Craft CMS vs WordPress: Which is the best CMS for your business? (2025)
Craft CMS vs WordPress: Which is the best CMS for your business? (2025)

Craft CMS vs WordPress: Headless Freedom or Plugin Paradise?

Building a website isn’t just about establishing your online presence; it’s about creating a strategic tool that fuels your brand’s growth. With a vast landscape of Content Management Systems (CMS) to choose from, making the right decision has never been more important. Two popular contenders—Craft CMS and WordPress—offer unique strengths and cater to distinct business needs. Whether you’re a seasoned marketer, an entrepreneur, or a design agency building client sites, understanding the nuances of each platform is crucial.

Having worked extensively with both Craft CMS and WordPress over the years, we’ve learned a lot about the pros and cons of each. WordPress remains dominant, powering approximately 45% of websites globally and maintaining over 60% of the CMS market share. Craft CMS, initially launched in 2012, has rapidly grown as the CMS of choice among creative agencies, enterprise clients, and brands looking for more flexibility. Currently, Craft powers roughly 100,000 websites, up significantly from previous years.

While market share offers some insight, we’ll focus our comparison on five primary areas: performance, community support, security, content management, and costs—helping you choose the ideal CMS for your digital strategy.

Headless CMS Capabilities: Craft’s Seamless Integration vs. WordPress Plugins

Headless CMS architectures allow you to deliver content efficiently to any front-end platform, be it a website, mobile app, or interactive kiosk. Craft CMS has fully embraced headless architecture, providing robust GraphQL and REST APIs natively. This native capability gives developers flexibility without the constraints of pre-built themes or complex setups.

WordPress, traditionally reliant on plugins like WPGraphQL for headless functionality, has begun incorporating headless-friendly improvements into its core since version 6.5. While this evolution reduces complexity, it still largely depends on plugins and third-party integrations, potentially creating compatibility and security challenges.

Ultimately, if streamlined headless integration is a priority, Craft CMS remains the smoother, less complicated option. If your project requires extensive customization through plugins, WordPress may hold appeal—though with added complexity.

Community & Plugin Ecosystem: Quantity vs. Quality

There’s hardly a web developer who hasn’t interacted with WordPress. Its third-party market includes over 60,000 plugins, thousands of themes, and extensive community forums. This immense ecosystem enables quick setup, but comes with a notable downside—plugin quality and compatibility vary wildly, introducing risks like security vulnerabilities and site instability.

Conversely, Craft CMS offers a smaller, highly curated plugin marketplace (now exceeding 1,000 plugins). Updates and licensing are streamlined directly within the Craft CMS control panel, providing clear oversight of plugin health and security. While fewer in number, Craft’s plugins consistently deliver higher reliability, significantly reducing technical debt.

Craft’s community thrives through active developer engagement on platforms like Discord and StackExchange, allowing faster issue resolution and more targeted advice. WordPress’s larger community offers vast online resources, but assistance can vary greatly depending on your chosen plugin or theme.

Craft CMS Plugins Library
Craft CMS Plugin Marketplace
Wordpress plugins
Wordpress CMS Plugin Store

Wordpress plugins
Wordpress CMS Plugin Store

Security & Technical Debt: Craft’s Significant Advantage

Despite ongoing improvements, WordPress continues to be the most frequently hacked CMS platform. Security experts regularly highlight vulnerabilities stemming from outdated plugins and themes. Approximately 90% of all CMS security breaches involve WordPress sites, largely due to third-party dependencies.

Craft CMS, however, benefits from fewer plugins, more stringent plugin quality control, and a smaller attack surface. Regular updates from Craft’s developers are straightforward, ensuring vulnerabilities are swiftly addressed. Features such as granular user permissions and built-in SQL injection protections offer enterprise-grade security out-of-the-box.

If security is your primary concern, Craft CMS undeniably provides greater peace of mind. For WordPress sites, adopting a headless architecture and investing in premium managed hosting like WP Engine can help mitigate risks but require more proactive management.

Content Management: Craft CMS’s Powerful Flexibility vs. WordPress’s Simplicity

Craft CMS shines in content flexibility and management. Its modular, Matrix-based content editing experience enables quick adjustments to content structure. Editors can effortlessly rearrange content blocks, manage complex layouts, and preview edits in real-time—an essential benefit when quick experimentation and optimization matter.

With Craft’s latest releases, content editing has become even smoother, adding features like conditional fields, nested blocks, and a unified editor experience. These improvements significantly streamline content workflows and reduce editorial friction.

WordPress, originally a blogging platform, has evolved with its Gutenberg editor, adding drag-and-drop block management similar to Craft’s Matrix fields. However, its editing interface can still feel cluttered and less intuitive, especially when using numerous plugins for additional features. WordPress’s reliance on third-party page builders (e.g., Elementor, Divi) often results in slower backend performance and additional complexity.

Costs: Predictability vs. Hidden Expenses

WordPress starts as a free, open-source CMS, making it appealing for budget-conscious projects. However, hidden costs quickly add up—premium plugins, themes, security measures, hosting, and developer time to manage compatibility issues frequently surpass initial budgets. Managed hosting services (such as WP Engine) are recommended to maintain security and plugin compatibility, adding additional monthly expenses.

Craft CMS requires a one-time $299 licensing fee (with a minimal annual renewal fee of $59). Its streamlined architecture typically reduces long-term development and maintenance costs. Fewer required plugins also mean fewer paid extensions, contributing to a lower total cost of ownership over the website’s lifespan.

For websites needing e-commerce, Craft Commerce starts at $199 for a lite version and up to $999 for full-featured solutions, with modest annual fees. This predictability and reduced long-term technical debt often make Craft a more cost-effective option in the long run.

Speed & Performance: Craft’s Lightweight Advantage

Website performance directly impacts conversion rates and user experience. According to Google, bounce rates spike dramatically with each additional second of loading time. WordPress, due to plugin bloat and inefficient themes, often suffers performance degradation. Continuous optimization is necessary to ensure fast load times.

Craft CMS’s minimal plugin dependency, streamlined codebase, and efficient templating system typically result in superior site performance out-of-the-box. Developers appreciate Craft’s minimalist backend, providing consistently faster editing experiences, even as the site grows.

Real-World Examples & Use Cases

WordPress remains the go-to for simple websites, blogs, and smaller e-commerce operations (often via WooCommerce). Brands seeking quick setup, affordability, and widespread plugin availability commonly select WordPress, often accepting performance and security trade-offs.

Craft CMS has rapidly gained traction among mid-market to enterprise brands, creative agencies, and content-heavy websites prioritizing security, performance, and content flexibility. Organizations such as Netflix, Sonos, and IDEO now use Craft to power websites requiring custom, scalable content solutions.

Final Recommendation: Craft CMS or WordPress?

Choosing between Craft CMS and WordPress ultimately depends on your specific project goals:

• Choose WordPress if you’re a small business or blogger needing quick deployment, abundant plugins, and lower initial cost.

• Choose Craft CMS if your brand prioritizes long-term scalability, content flexibility, exceptional security, and lower technical debt.

As web developers, we often lean toward Craft CMS. Its thoughtful approach to content editing, exceptional security, streamlined headless integration, and strong performance align with our mission of building sustainable, future-proof digital experiences.

If you’re seeking guidance or development support with Craft CMS, Electric Enjin remains a proud Craft Partner, showcased prominently for our successful Craft projects.

Feature Craft CMS WordPress
Ease of Use & Interface Modern, intuitive, highly customizable editor experience tailored for content editors. Familiar but cluttered; steep learning curve for advanced customization.
Content Flexibility & Management Flexible, modular content structure with Matrix fields; powerful for content-heavy, complex sites. Traditional CMS structure; content flexibility often depends on third-party plugins like Advanced Custom Fields (ACF).
Performance & Speed Fast, efficient out-of-the-box; minimal plugins required, resulting in better performance. Performance often hindered by plugin bloat; requires constant optimization to maintain speed.
Security & Vulnerabilities Strong built-in security; fewer vulnerabilities due to streamlined codebase and fewer third-party plugins. Most hacked CMS (over 95% of CMS hacks); high security risks from plugins and themes.
Technical Debt & Maintenance Minimal tech debt; straightforward updates, significantly lower maintenance costs over time. High technical debt due to plugin/theme reliance; maintenance costs escalate quickly over time.
SEO & Marketing Capabilities Native SEO-friendly URLs, easy metadata editing, excellent performance enhancing SEO. Strong SEO capabilities via plugins (Yoast, Rank Math); plugin-dependent, adds complexity.
Customization & Design Freedom Fully custom from the ground up; ideal for tailored, unique digital experiences without theme constraints. Themes and templates offer quick start but limit true design freedom without significant customization effort.
Headless & API Capabilities Built-in GraphQL and robust headless capabilities; excellent for decoupled architecture. Headless capability through third-party plugins like WPGraphQL; more complex setup.
Community & Support Dedicated, professional support and a tight-knit, developer-friendly community (Slack, StackExchange). Large community; support quality varies widely, often forum-driven with slower responses.
Plugin & Integration Quality Curated plugin marketplace; fewer but high-quality, professionally managed plugins. Massive plugin repository; varied quality, frequent compatibility and security issues.
Licensing & Costs One-time $299 license fee (free for solo sites); predictable ongoing costs, minimal overhead. Open-source free platform; hidden costs from plugins, themes, security, and hosting quickly add up.
Ideal Use Cases & Business Types Brands prioritizing performance, custom UX, secure and scalable solutions (mid-market, enterprise, and content-driven brands). Small businesses, blogs, content publishers looking for quick setup and willing to manage tech internally.
Market Share & Adoption Smaller overall market share (~0.5%), but growing rapidly among developers and brands valuing tailored, secure experiences. Largest CMS (~43% total market share), heavily favored by smaller websites but prone to security issues and plugin overload.

selected projects
selected projects
selected projects
Big ideas. Bigger results. Let’s make it happen. Get an instant quote today.

sf-required

Manage recurring validation states.
sf-form_input
sf-required
Field Input (Required)
sf-form_checkbox-field
sf-required
Checkbox (Required)
sf-form_radio-field
sf-required
Radio (Required)
sf-form_input-select
sf-required
Select (Required)
sf-form_input-date
is-icon-left-right
sf-required
sf-form-icon-left
sf-required
Date Input (Required)
This is an error tag
sf-form_input-error-wrapper
sf-required
Error Tag (Required)
sf-form-icon-right
sf-required
Icon on Input Right (Required)
sf-form-icon-left
sf-required
Icon on Input Left (Required)
sf-form-icon-right
is-text-area
sf-required
Icon on Input Right Text Area (Required)

sf-checked

Manage recurring checked radio & checkboxes states.
sf-form_checkbox-field
sf-checked
Checkbox (Checked)
sf-form_radio-field
sf-checked
Radio (Checked)

sf-focus

Manage recurring focusing for button, radio and checkbox states.
sf-form_radio-field
sf-focus
Radio (Focused)
sf-form_checkbox-field
sf-focus
Checkbox (Focused)

sf-hide

Manage hidden states.
sf-skeleton
sf-hide
Loader Box (Currently Hidden)

sf-await

Manage awaiting states.
sf-button-child
sf-await
sf-button-await-child
sf-await
Awaiting Status of Buttons
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Step {Current Slide}/{Max Slides}

Project Details

Start by telling us about your project.
This field is empty
Enter a valid email
Select one option
Next Slide

Key Project Requirements

Tell us about the essential features and requirements for your project.
This field is empty
Select one option
Next Slide

Timeline & Budget

Tell us about your project's timeline and budget.
This field is empty
Select one option
Next Slide

Additional Information

Anything else you'd like to add?
This field is empty
Select one option
End
Thank you! Your submission has been received! A representative will be in touch within 24 hours.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.